How could I have been so utterly clueless? He was right in front of me the entire time, laughing at me, playing out his trick.
Every time I look back, I see more signs and clues. Mostly, I remember our friendly arguments about Georg Hegel and Arthur Schopenhauer; how we would sit by the window and banter good-naturedly about Hegel's falling into drastic disfavor in modern thought. I am a student of philosophy, but never once did I remember this famous quote made by Sir Karl Popper concerning Hegel:
"It was child's play for Hegel's powerful dialectical methods to draw real physical rabbits out of purely metaphysical silk hats."
Oh, and of course, Hegel died when? 1831.
I come again to Taras' post, which at this point has been scrutinized more closely than the Zapruder film. With his final words he makes a comment which I took to mean that the Magician is everywhere and all-powerful, but in fact I think he was trying to give us a clue:
"The young man had helpfully left the code key active, and while it was impossible to read what had been previously written, anything could be typed in and transmitted. It didn't matter, the magician read everything and he didn't need codes or magic to do it."
He meant it literally. He was telling us that the Magician was just looking over my mother's shoulder and reading everything, no magic necessary.
Mary begs me not to judge us too harshly, but I can't stop thinking about it. We see what we want to see, I suppose.
I'll give myself one more hour of looking back and beating the hell out of myself. From then on, it's the Magician's turn.
No comments:
Post a Comment